Give an old post a second launch
A post from eighteen months ago has already earned its research. A sheet made from it is a new asset with none of the writing cost, and it links back to the original.
Hand over a link. The page is read, the findings and figures come out, and you get back a sheet that carries the argument in one look — with the source on it.
Public pages only · free to try · about a minute per sheet
A post from eighteen months ago has already earned its research. A sheet made from it is a new asset with none of the writing cost, and it links back to the original.
Links get clicked by people who already trust you. Visuals get forwarded by people who do not yet. One post can carry both.
Industry reports, competitor pages, public data releases. Cite the source on the sheet — a summary that hides where it came from is the kind that gets you a takedown rather than a link.
The readable article is taken and the furniture around it — navigation, cookie banners, related-post rails, comment threads — is discarded.
Sub-headings and the opening paragraphs tell it what the piece set out to argue, which becomes the headline of the sheet.
Figures, dates and named comparisons come out with their units. A claim with no number behind it stays as a point rather than becoming a fake chart.
Choose portrait for a feed, wide for a slide or story for a phone before it composes, so it is never a crop of another shape.
Four rules for summarising a page you did not write
Repurposing is legitimate and normal. Repurposing badly is how a useful tactic turns into a complaint, so these are worth reading once.
Captions do not travel. Once a sheet is screenshotted and reposted, the only attribution that survives is the one drawn into the footer. Put the source there.
A visual that reproduces the substance of somebody else’s article is a copy with a new typeface. Take the findings, add your own framing, and link to the original for the argument.
A number that has been through a summariser is a number you have not verified. Open both and read them side by side before publishing.
If the article is behind a wall, there is nothing to read. Paste the text you have legitimate access to instead.
Long-form articles, blog posts, documentation, public reports and data releases — anything with headings and a few real figures. Product pages, image galleries and pages that are mostly video have little for it to read.
No. It can only read what is publicly available at the address you gave it. For anything else, paste in the text you already have access to.
No — it summarises it and rewrites for a sheet, and headings on an infographic are four to eight words long. You are still responsible for how you use somebody else’s material, so credit the source and link back.
You convert one link at a time. In practice that is the right unit of work anyway — each sheet wants a moment of judgement about which claim it is leading with.
You can put the source URL in the footer, and on a share link you can add the article link beside the piece. Both are worth doing: the sheet is the hook, the article is the destination.
For research and internal analysis, yes. For publishing, summarise responsibly, add your own analysis and credit them — that is the difference between a citation and a repost.
It has already proved the idea is worth attention. Give it a second format.
Paste a link